Above is the reason for my delay. I'm redoing the entire cabin. Added 5 person bar around kitchen, nice wood cabinets, bamboo floors, king size bed, flat screen high-definition TV, bamboo wainscotting, all new furniture, and etc. I also installed a wireless trolling motor forward to act as a bow thruster and emergency backup power, a powered jackplate on the outboard to raise the motor for shallow ops, GPS chartplotter with fuel management software, and a bunch of other expensive stuff.
The below is a _link_ that has a sales flyer on it for cat cruisers with some lofty claims that I _base_d my purchase on. Just hit the PDF file that says click here:
http://www.cruisingcatsusa.com/mod_vagabond.php3I talked to the owner of the dealership. He said that he sells boats that are 5 or 6 times more expensive but which are not 5 or 6 times better boats. He said they are "price point boats". They are built cheap, but strong, and do a lot for what you are paying. He has a 40 footer that he takes into Puget Sound. He said the boat is fine in 3 footers but that who wants to go boating in 3 foot of chop? He is the one that gave me the argument that the boat was good 95% of the time in coastal cruising and that the expensive ones, that he also sells, were good for 98% to 99% of the time but cost 5 times as much or more.
Anyway that is what I've been defending on this site. That my clunker was good enough to do the intercoastal.
This is the crew for the trip.
This is what a Cat Cruiser Hull looks like from the front (above). Below are a couple of pictures of my boat:
dc9loser38926.4432523148